Feminist Would Hate Such Legislation

What if child support was a fixed monthly payment, scaled by the age of the child, not by how much the father earns? What if both parents were required to live within 60 miles of each other, making it impossible for one parent to weaponize distance and alienation? What if both parents were legally bound to split health and education costs 50 50, no excuses?
 
Now ask yourself, why does a woman feel entitled to re sue a man for $35,000 more per month because he increased his own wealth? Since when did child support become a lifestyle upgrade for the mother? You do not need a millionaire’s salary to pay for Pilates lessons for a kid. That is greed, plain and simple.
 
What if false allegations of abuse, assault, or harassment were punished by the maximum prison sentence of the crime falsely accused? The court system would be a ghost town. Fabricated victimhood would evaporate overnight.
 
Do you think feminists will agree to this? Absolutely not. It removes their biggest weapon, the ability to profit from victim narratives, exploit family courts, and destroy men without consequences.
 
As for me, I support this idea 100 percent. Accountability is not misogyny. Fairness is not oppression. Equality means both sides bleed the same when they lie.

Feminist Would Hate Such Legislation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *